Case study

A failing diaphragm pump, caught before it failed

Predictive maintenanceWaterBreweries & Beverage

A failing diaphragm pump caught before it failed — 540,000 L/day of loss prevented.

Carlsberg Canada

Published with Carlsberg Canada’s permission, with the source of every figure printed below (G7).

Photo slot · case-carlsberg-pump — pending the photography cull (§K.3 #27).

How it went.

Every study on this site runs the same four beats, in the same order.

  1. 01

    Alert

    Diaphragm pumps degrade before they fail, and the degradation is invisible to the naked eye.

  2. 02

    Cost

    540,000 L per day — Identified loss, and over $1,333/day in prevented cost.

  3. 03

    Fix

    Flow monitoring on the transfer line · Baseline and flow-signature tracking in the dashboard · SMS and email alerting on drift off baseline

  4. 04

    Restored

    A scheduled diaphragm replacement, no production impact

In full.

The problem

“Diaphragm pumps don’t fail all at once. They degrade. And when they degrade, the flow signature changes — subtle, gradual, invisible to the naked eye. But not to a sensor.”

What we installed

Flow monitoring on the transfer line, with the baseline and the flow signature tracked continuously in the dashboard, and alerting the moment the trace moved off baseline.

What the data showed

“We saw the pattern change on a Carlsberg transfer line. Flagged it. Maintenance found the diaphragm failing — not failed, failing. They replaced it. Scheduled. Orderly. No production impact.”

The number

540,000 L/day of identified loss. Over $1,333/day in prevented cost. Source: NB Power RFP 0770-25-S510, Reference 3.

What it buys you

“This is what monitoring buys you. Not the repair — the timing.”

What the data looked like.

Hover or arrow-key across the trace to read any interval. The flagged point is the one that started the conversation.

A failing diaphragm pump, caught before it failed
ESTABLISHED PEAKNormal strokePeak down, floor upSignature off baseline540,000 L/day at risk · >$1,333/day
TRANSFER LINE FLOW · ONE DAY · 30-MIN BUCKETS · DASHED = ESTABLISHED PEAK
Chart data
IntervalTransfer line (L/min)
00:0012
00:30117
01:00119
01:3011
02:0011
02:30118
03:00118
03:3012
04:0013
04:30120
05:00116
05:3014
06:0013
06:30115
07:00114
07:3012
08:0015
08:30112
09:00110
09:3016
10:0018
10:30107
11:00107
11:3018
12:0018
12:30104
13:00104
13:3019
14:0019
14:30100
15:0098
15:3021
16:0021
16:3096
17:0095
17:3025
18:0024
18:3091
19:0090
19:3027
20:0028
20:3088
21:0085
21:3028
22:0029
22:3084
23:0083
23:3030
Before and after, in words
BeforeA flow signature drifting, unnoticed, toward a shutdown
AfterA scheduled diaphragm replacement, no production impact

The published totals are the §H.1 figures. The interval shape is a representative reconstruction and is flagged as such in the dataset; the measured series drops into the same file under G6 with no markup change (§K.3 #28).

What changed.

Before

A flow signature drifting, unnoticed, toward a shutdown

After

A scheduled diaphragm replacement, no production impact

540,000 L

per day

Identified loss, and over $1,333/day in prevented cost.

Source: NB Power RFP 0770-25-S510 FINAL, Reference 3 (§H.1 claim 2)

Find out what’s hiding in your plant.

Half a day on your floor, no charge and no obligation. At the end of it we tell you what we saw, what we would meter first, and what the return looks like.

Your first opportunity assessment is free.

Book a free consultationAll case studies

or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)