Illustrative scenario
Conveyor drive bearing degradation caught six weeks early
Illustrative scenario — representative of common industrial IoT applications
Predictive maintenanceBulk Handling & Rail LogisticsManufacturing — automotive, plastics & rubber
A bearing changed its signature about six weeks before it would have seized.
A bulk handling facility
How it went.
Every study on this site runs the same four beats, in the same order.
01
Alert
A drive bearing on a main conveyor is a single point of failure for a whole line, and it gives very little audible warning.
02
Cost
6 weeks of warning — Between the first signature change and projected seizure.
03
Fix
Vibration and temperature sensor on the drive bearing · Runtime hours from the motor current · Trend alerting against the asset's own baseline
04
Restored
A planned Saturday bearing change
In full.
Illustrative scenario — representative of common industrial IoT applications.
The problem
A drive bearing on a main conveyor is a single point of failure for a whole line, and it gives very little audible warning.
What would be installed
- Vibration and temperature sensor on the drive bearing
- Runtime hours from the motor current
- Trend alerting against the asset’s own baseline
What changes
Before — A line stoppage waiting to happen After — A planned Saturday bearing change
The number
6 weeks of warning — Between the first signature change and projected seizure. Illustrative scenario, not a client result. Figure is representative, not measured. [TOM-REVIEW]
In one line
The same repair, done on a Saturday instead of in a crisis. That difference is worth more than the part.
What the data looked like.
Hover or arrow-key across the trace to read any interval. The flagged point is the one that started the conversation.
| Interval | Drive end (mm/s) | Non-drive end (mm/s) |
|---|---|---|
| D1 | 1.86 | 1.79 |
| D2 | 1.88 | 1.88 |
| D3 | 1.98 | 1.81 |
| D4 | 1.87 | 1.87 |
| D5 | 1.93 | 1.72 |
| D6 | 1.83 | 1.84 |
| D7 | 1.94 | 1.73 |
| D8 | 1.90 | 1.73 |
| D9 | 1.84 | 1.79 |
| D10 | 1.94 | 1.81 |
| D11 | 1.93 | 1.77 |
| D12 | 1.99 | 1.73 |
| D13 | 1.94 | 1.84 |
| D14 | 1.93 | 1.77 |
| D15 | 1.84 | 1.80 |
| D16 | 1.96 | 1.73 |
| D17 | 1.89 | 1.86 |
| D18 | 1.95 | 1.86 |
| D19 | 1.91 | 1.80 |
| D20 | 1.85 | 1.71 |
| D21 | 1.89 | 1.82 |
| D22 | 1.97 | 1.85 |
| D23 | 1.86 | 1.80 |
| D24 | 1.86 | 1.87 |
| D25 | 1.82 | 1.76 |
| D26 | 1.91 | 1.89 |
| D27 | 1.88 | 1.89 |
| D28 | 1.82 | 1.76 |
| D29 | 1.94 | 1.85 |
| D30 | 1.90 | 1.86 |
| D31 | 1.94 | 1.80 |
| D32 | 1.92 | 1.78 |
| D33 | 1.96 | 1.71 |
| D34 | 1.88 | 1.76 |
| D35 | 1.95 | 1.86 |
| D36 | 1.82 | 1.80 |
| D37 | 1.97 | 1.81 |
| D38 | 1.88 | 1.88 |
| D39 | 1.92 | 1.75 |
| D40 | 1.97 | 1.86 |
| D41 | 1.90 | 1.79 |
| D42 | 1.83 | 1.73 |
| D43 | 1.89 | 1.85 |
| D44 | 1.97 | 1.79 |
| D45 | 1.97 | 1.73 |
| D46 | 1.89 | 1.81 |
| D47 | 1.87 | 1.86 |
| D48 | 1.98 | 1.73 |
| D49 | 1.87 | 1.85 |
| D50 | 1.89 | 1.83 |
| D51 | 1.81 | 1.80 |
| D52 | 1.84 | 1.80 |
| D53 | 1.89 | 1.87 |
| D54 | 1.86 | 1.76 |
| D55 | 1.86 | 1.81 |
| D56 | 1.95 | 1.75 |
| D57 | 2.01 | 1.82 |
| D58 | 2.22 | 1.78 |
| D59 | 2.32 | 1.72 |
| D60 | 2.27 | 1.88 |
| D61 | 2.36 | 1.76 |
| D62 | 2.46 | 1.73 |
| D63 | 2.60 | 1.79 |
| D64 | 2.63 | 1.75 |
| D65 | 2.83 | 1.80 |
| D66 | 2.84 | 1.71 |
| D67 | 3.00 | 1.86 |
| D68 | 3.09 | 1.79 |
| D69 | 3.24 | 1.76 |
| D70 | 3.25 | 1.82 |
| D71 | 3.41 | 1.79 |
| D72 | 3.39 | 1.87 |
| D73 | 3.52 | 1.78 |
| D74 | 3.57 | 1.82 |
| D75 | 3.78 | 1.74 |
| D76 | 3.71 | 1.81 |
| D77 | 3.84 | 1.87 |
| D78 | 4.01 | 1.73 |
| D79 | 4.03 | 1.87 |
| D80 | 4.10 | 1.83 |
| D81 | 4.28 | 1.81 |
| D82 | 4.40 | 1.83 |
| D83 | 4.42 | 1.77 |
| D84 | 4.55 | 1.85 |
| D85 | 4.55 | 1.85 |
| D86 | 4.75 | 1.85 |
| D87 | 4.82 | 1.87 |
| D88 | 4.85 | 1.77 |
| D89 | 4.92 | 1.75 |
| D90 | 5.09 | 1.86 |
| Before | A line stoppage waiting to happen |
|---|---|
| After | A planned Saturday bearing change |
Illustrative dataset — a representative operational profile, seeded and deterministic, not measured at any site.
What changed.
Before
A line stoppage waiting to happen
After
A planned Saturday bearing change
6 weeks
of warning
Between the first signature change and projected seizure.
Source: Illustrative scenario, not a client result. Figure is representative, not measured. [TOM-REVIEW]
Where to go next.
The sector, the sibling studies, and the calculator that runs this same arithmetic on your own numbers.
Predictive maintenanceMunicipal & Public Utilities
Pump cavitation caught three weeks early
A municipal water facility
The vibration signature changed about three weeks before anyone would have heard it.
3 weeksof warning
Illustrative scenario
Predictive maintenanceWaterBreweries & Beverage
A failing diaphragm pump, caught before it failed
Carlsberg Canada
A failing diaphragm pump caught before it failed — 540,000 L/day of loss prevented.
540,000 Lper day
Find out what’s hiding in your plant.
Half a day on your floor, no charge and no obligation. At the end of it we tell you what we saw, what we would meter first, and what the return looks like.
Your first opportunity assessment is free.
Book a free consultationAll case studies
or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)